I just had this long post that I'd been working on talking about what's been going on lately, but it was too gripey and long-winded. So I deleted it. I complain too much.
Here's all that matters from the past few weeks. The factory job ended Saturday. That made me sad. On Monday Manpower said they had no jobs available at the moment. That also made me sad, and stressed. However, I was too busy not sleeping/desperately trying to sleep to worry about that too much. This made me exhausted, and sick as well--sore throat/sinus problems. Wednesday they called and said they had a job at a call center starting the next morning. That made me happy and stressed. It went well the first couple days, and in any case it's a paycheck for the next four weeks or so. That made me happy.
Saturday I spent the day with The Family to celebrate The Mother's upcoming birthday, and had a blast. And ate freshly baked cookies. Between all of us nomming on the deliciousness, none of the batch ever made it to the cooling rack. I also got some exercise walking around a "historical village," but I quickly negated the exercise by eating an enormous meal. That meal was also delicious. In two weeks we'll be traveling to see The Oldest Younger Brother graduate from basic training (Navy). That makes me happy.
I've been having serious problems with my phone. That makes me sad.
I stopped slacking long enough to post this after not posting for a while. That makes me happy.
And at least I'm temporarily employed. That makes me happy.
If you're expecting to be impressed, you've come to the wrong place. My apologies.
Sunday, August 28, 2011
Scratch that.
Labels:
depression
,
family
,
I have people
,
insomnia
,
the title may be a *bit* misleading
,
work stuff
Friday, August 19, 2011
My inner emo-kid emerges.
You can love your child and not see pain.
You can love your child and not see their happiness.
You can love your child and not see dysfunction.
You can love your child and not see their dreams.
You can love your child and not see their feelings.
You can love your child and not see their talents.
You can love your child and not see their fears.
You can love your child and not see they are being abused or bullied.
You can love your child and not see their interests.
You can love your child and hate the things they do.
You can love your child and not see the pressure they are under, by you or their peers.
You can love your child and not see the difficulty they have reading, or writing, or hearing, or seeing, or speaking.
You can love your child and not see disability.
You can love your child and not see that how drastically your actions are affecting them, negatively OR positively.
You can love your child and not see they feel abandoned or neglected.
You can love your child and not see their affection for you.
You can love your child and not see mental illness or addiction.
You can love your child and not see that they are separate from you.
You can love your child and not see what it is that really makes them wonderful.
You can love your child and not see their vulnerability.
You can love your child and not see their strength.
What I'm trying to say here is that you can love your child and not see beyond your own hopes, dreams, expectations, and fears for them. What I'm trying to say here is that no parent is even close to perfect, and neither is any child. What I'm trying to say here is that it is okay to mess up, whether you're someone's parent, or child, or both.
But what I'm really trying to say is that while it can be difficult to see beyond your own hopes, dreams, expectations, and fears for your kids, it is absolutely imperative that you do. "Different" from what you hoped they'd be is neither more nor less than you hoped they'd be; it is merely different. You are a tremendous influence on their lives, but by no means are you their only influence. The way you thought or hoped their life would go does not matter nearly as much as what actually happens, and how you handle it together.
You can love your child and not see their happiness.
You can love your child and not see dysfunction.
You can love your child and not see their dreams.
You can love your child and not see their feelings.
You can love your child and not see their talents.
You can love your child and not see their fears.
You can love your child and not see they are being abused or bullied.
You can love your child and not see their interests.
You can love your child and hate the things they do.
You can love your child and not see the pressure they are under, by you or their peers.
You can love your child and not see the difficulty they have reading, or writing, or hearing, or seeing, or speaking.
You can love your child and not see disability.
You can love your child and not see that how drastically your actions are affecting them, negatively OR positively.
You can love your child and not see they feel abandoned or neglected.
You can love your child and not see their affection for you.
You can love your child and not see mental illness or addiction.
You can love your child and not see that they are separate from you.
You can love your child and not see what it is that really makes them wonderful.
You can love your child and not see their vulnerability.
You can love your child and not see their strength.
What I'm trying to say here is that you can love your child and not see beyond your own hopes, dreams, expectations, and fears for them. What I'm trying to say here is that no parent is even close to perfect, and neither is any child. What I'm trying to say here is that it is okay to mess up, whether you're someone's parent, or child, or both.
But what I'm really trying to say is that while it can be difficult to see beyond your own hopes, dreams, expectations, and fears for your kids, it is absolutely imperative that you do. "Different" from what you hoped they'd be is neither more nor less than you hoped they'd be; it is merely different. You are a tremendous influence on their lives, but by no means are you their only influence. The way you thought or hoped their life would go does not matter nearly as much as what actually happens, and how you handle it together.
Labels:
family
,
lists
,
sadness
,
small wonders
,
work it out
Thursday, August 18, 2011
The power of "No."
"No" is an interesting concept to me. As children, we were constantly told "no" by our caregivers, whether it's a sudden, shouted "NO!" (usually in the case of danger or irritation) or a gentle, drawn out "nnnoooo..." (usually used with redirection). Naturally, "no" becomes one of a kid's favorite words to repeat over and over until all the adults around him or her feel the urge to repeatedly slam their own heads against whatever solid object is closest. Or jam q-tips into their ears well past the point of resistance to keep from ever having to hear that word again.
But somewhere along the way we are taught that "no" is a word that we should not use, or else people will perceive us as mean, or rude, or selfish. If we do use "no," it's the gentle, drawn out version, usually paired with a grimace, a shrug, an apology, an excuse, or all of the above at the same time. And if there's an excuse, it may or may not be the honest reason.
For example, someone stops by your house unexpectedly. You might say, "Nnnoooooo, I really can't sit and chat with you today... I'm on my way out the door right now. I'm sorry! Maybe some other time!"
And maybe that is an honest reason, and not one that's honest only because you suddenly decided to leave your home rather than face a minute of the company they've forced on you without fucking calling first. The honest reason may be completely different, and may be totally innocent or not so sweet. It could be that you or your house truly are a mess unfit for company, or that you were really into your Weeds marathon on Netflix, or that this person has a nasty habit of frequently stopping by unannounced, bringing bratty kids or irritating pets, not correcting those kids or pets when they are wrecking your shit or piercing your eardrums, and staying all fucking day while saying twelve times an hour "I guess we better get going!"-- and then they DON'T.
I digress. What I was trying to say is that at some point we are taught that the only people who should ever hear the solid "no" are children. Have you ever given someone in day-to-day conversation the quick, firm "No.", with or without an explanation following, and watched them blink really fast, actually stop in their tracks, and maybe physically recoil a little? Dude, you should check it out next time. Some people can be cool about it and shrug it off. They knew that their request was not likely to be met for whatever reason, and they move on. Some people, though, get seriously upset or whiny or whatever when someone tells them "no," and they don't give a shit what your reasoning is, or whether it was that big of a deal in the first place. This is where you might suddenly feel the need to stammer an apology or an excuse, or might find yourself being talked (coerced...) into doing whatever it was they had wanted you to do. In that situation, the initial issue ceases to be the problem--your inability to stick to your guns becomes the problem. Therefore, don't bitch to me about it, because you and I both know it's going to happen every time.
I say unless it's a life-or-death situation, you don't freakin' owe anyone a reason why you're saying "no" if you feel you have a good reason. (Disclaimer: I wouldn't recommend trying this with your boss. That's a good way to get canned PDQ.) And if you have certain requirements you want met in order for you to say "yes" instead, then don't switch to saying "yes" until those requirements are actually met. And for the love of Bob, people, say what you really mean--don't say "no" if you know you don't mean it. Otherwise, "no" will continue to mean absolutely nothing, people will continue to feel like they are taken advantage of, and I may find the need to post another long gripe posed as a theoretical discussion. I know there's more to say on the subject, but I've digressed from the point quite enough.
Any thoughts? (I mean on the topic of "no," asshole, not on my tendency to ramble.)
But somewhere along the way we are taught that "no" is a word that we should not use, or else people will perceive us as mean, or rude, or selfish. If we do use "no," it's the gentle, drawn out version, usually paired with a grimace, a shrug, an apology, an excuse, or all of the above at the same time. And if there's an excuse, it may or may not be the honest reason.
For example, someone stops by your house unexpectedly. You might say, "Nnnoooooo, I really can't sit and chat with you today... I'm on my way out the door right now. I'm sorry! Maybe some other time!"
And maybe that is an honest reason, and not one that's honest only because you suddenly decided to leave your home rather than face a minute of the company they've forced on you without fucking calling first. The honest reason may be completely different, and may be totally innocent or not so sweet. It could be that you or your house truly are a mess unfit for company, or that you were really into your Weeds marathon on Netflix, or that this person has a nasty habit of frequently stopping by unannounced, bringing bratty kids or irritating pets, not correcting those kids or pets when they are wrecking your shit or piercing your eardrums, and staying all fucking day while saying twelve times an hour "I guess we better get going!"-- and then they DON'T.
I digress. What I was trying to say is that at some point we are taught that the only people who should ever hear the solid "no" are children. Have you ever given someone in day-to-day conversation the quick, firm "No.", with or without an explanation following, and watched them blink really fast, actually stop in their tracks, and maybe physically recoil a little? Dude, you should check it out next time. Some people can be cool about it and shrug it off. They knew that their request was not likely to be met for whatever reason, and they move on. Some people, though, get seriously upset or whiny or whatever when someone tells them "no," and they don't give a shit what your reasoning is, or whether it was that big of a deal in the first place. This is where you might suddenly feel the need to stammer an apology or an excuse, or might find yourself being talked (coerced...) into doing whatever it was they had wanted you to do. In that situation, the initial issue ceases to be the problem--your inability to stick to your guns becomes the problem. Therefore, don't bitch to me about it, because you and I both know it's going to happen every time.
I say unless it's a life-or-death situation, you don't freakin' owe anyone a reason why you're saying "no" if you feel you have a good reason. (Disclaimer: I wouldn't recommend trying this with your boss. That's a good way to get canned PDQ.) And if you have certain requirements you want met in order for you to say "yes" instead, then don't switch to saying "yes" until those requirements are actually met. And for the love of Bob, people, say what you really mean--don't say "no" if you know you don't mean it. Otherwise, "no" will continue to mean absolutely nothing, people will continue to feel like they are taken advantage of, and I may find the need to post another long gripe posed as a theoretical discussion. I know there's more to say on the subject, but I've digressed from the point quite enough.
Any thoughts? (I mean on the topic of "no," asshole, not on my tendency to ramble.)
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)